| From a cut job, to a cut benefit, to where? | Bernadine Lawrence The government should think deeply about these welfare cuts, and those who will bear the brunt of themNews that some benefits are to be capped, as well as possibly amalgamated into one payment called a universal credit, filled me with alarm. It strikes me as odd, in this climate of severe cuts, that the Treasury is willing to gamble on an expensive new welfare system that has no real substance – where are the jobs that are allegedly out there, and what happens if you can't find one?Iain Duncan Smith has said: "For the most vulnerable I say: we will protect you." Well, I hope so. But politicians have no idea at all what it's like to live on benefits. Let's just take a look at the facts of what it's really like to live on jobseeker's allowance in London.I have a close friend who last August lost her council job working as a nursery nurse in a creche serving an adults' college. The creche was closed because of cutbacks, and with next to no savings, she is now trying to live on job seeker's allowance. She says she feels ashamed having to sign on every fortnight and always hopes no one sees her going into the jobcentre. She also finds it oppressive when she goes because some of the staff can be bullying and there are often raised voices in the "interview" rooms.She gave me a breakdown of her weekly finances for the purpose of this article:• JSA – £65.45• Rent – £28 (after housing benefit of £115.25)This leaves her with £37.45 a week. She sets aside money for her bills each week.• £7 for electricity• £1.30 for gas• £7 for phone, television and broadbandAll of which amounts to £15.30 per week. She is left with £22.15 for the week, out of which she has to buy food and other necessities. That works out at just over £3 a day to live on – and that sum would be lower if you're under 25.My friend does her best to live within her means and not break into her bill money – she goes to the local fruit and vegetable market, which is just over half an hour's walk away. She times it so that she arrives just before closing time and if she's quick enough she can elbow out competition and grab bargains such as strawberries, tomatoes or even avocados at knockdown prices. There's also a good butcher's shop there, which always has a queue outside and sometimes she'll buy end cuts for stews and pies. At the fish stall she can buy a small mackerel for "next to nothing".But my friend is constantly worried about being able to pay her bills. She has had no success yet at finding another job and as she is close to the official retirement age, she feels that her age might go against her. Most of all, she fears being out of work for over a year and having to deal with a further cut in income. This is because, under new budget proposals, those unfortunate enough to be on JSA for a year or over would receive a 10% cut to their housing benefit.I did some calculations to work out how much she would have left to live on, if she ever found herself in that unfortunate position, and this is how it works out:A 10% reduction in housing benefit would mean it would go down from £115.25 to £103.73. Weekly rent payable would hence rise from £28 to £39.52. Deduct £39.52 rent from £65.45 JSA and you are left with just £25.93 for the week with which to cover bills, food and other necessities. Get rid of phone, television and broadband at £7 per week and, if gas and electricity bills don't go up, monthly bills will be reduced to £8.30. That will leave £17.63 a week for food and other necessities – little more than £2 a day. My friend and thousands like her could very well be made homeless.In comparison with its European counterparts, Britain's level of benefit has always been painfully low. In a table of comparisons of EU countries and their provision of unemployment benefit, Britain was at the bottom at €368.20 per month (£314.99), Luxembourg was at the top with €2,210 per month (£1,890.63).The government should think deeply about these drastic welfare cuts, and those who will bear the brunt of them. Is it worth risking the destruction of the fabric of civilised society and risk a new era of social unrest? After all, when people have lost everything, what have they got to lose?WelfareState benefitsHousing benefitPublic sector cutsBernadine Lawrenceguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds guardian.co.uk |
How long will the miners' euphoria last? The rescued Chilean miners surfaced on a wave of hope for the future. But is it really possible to sustain this optimism? bbc.co.uk |
Spending review: Development aid money to Third World to rise by 40 per cent Spending on development aid to the third world is to rise by nearly 40 per cent. telegraph.co.uk |
Death of Gulf emirate ruler Sheikh Saqr prompts fight over succession Exiled crown prince Sheikh Khalid bin Saqr al-Qasimi returns to Ras al-Khaimah to reclaim 'birthright' from half-brotherOne of the most bizarre international coup attempts of recent times, whose key players include a family solicitor from Buckinghamshire and an exiled Arab crown prince, entered its endgame today with the death of Sheikh Saqr bin Mohammad al-Qasimi, the world's longest-serving ruler, who led the Gulf emirate of Ras al-Khaimah (RAK) for 62 years.Immediately after the 92-year-old sheikh died at dawn, his eldest son, the exiled crown prince, Sheikh Khalid bin Saqr al-Qasimi, re-entered the kingdom and went to the presidential palace in a bid to reclaim what he believes is his birthright from his younger half-brother, who has claimed the crown. It follows an extraordinary two-year public relations and lobbying campaign by the exiled sheikh who employed Peter Cathcart, a partner in a Middlesex family law firm, to co-ordinate a multi-million pound public relations and lobbying budget aimed at returning him to power. Cathcart is better known locally for his enthusiasm for driving miniature steam railway engines and his chairmanship of the parish council.RAK is the smallest of the seven emirates, but Sheikh Khalid, who has been living in exile in London and Oman, has used Californian PR firms, Washington lobbyists and American ex-special forces officers to claim it has fallen under Iranian influence and that the kingdom was used as a port for smuggling parts for weapons into Iran and had become a "centre of gravity" for "potential terrorist funding for al-Qaida, Taliban, al-Shabaab". The campaign, costing at least £2.6m according to documents seen by the Guardian, also involved lobbying Hillary Clinton and the Israeli ambassador to London and publishing critical reports on the military and political direction of the current regime.The government of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) issued a statement of condolence through the state news agency WAM, which stated that Sheikh Khalid's younger half-brother, the crown prince Sheikh Saud bin Saqr al-Qasimi, has succeeded as ruler. Sheikh Khalid did not accept the statement and issued a video message asserting his claim to the throne, and shortly afterwards described the UAE report of Sheikh Saud's succession as unacceptable."In honour of my father, I want the constitution on the succession in Ras al-Khaimah to be honoured where the whole family and tribes decide the succession," he said. "I will accept the outcome of a constitutional vote, not a decision taken by others for their own economic benefit … In the coming hours and days, I look forward to meeting with family, friends, members of the supreme council and rulers of the emirates to discuss our shared vision for Ras al-Khaimah and its great people. Until then, we will mourn together as a family, a community and a nation."Cathcart, who was working at his office in Ickenham, Middlesex, today , did not return calls.Sheikh Saud announced 40 days of mourning during which flags in the emirate will be flown at half mast and radio stations across the UAE switched to playing recitations of the Qur'an and classical music.The outcome of the tussle for power will provide a barometer of the direction of the UAE, according to Dr Christopher Davidson of Durham University, an expert in the region. He said the most powerful emirates are the broadly pro-western Abu Dhabi and Dubai, and they should in principle be sympathetic to Sheikh Khalid's argument about the danger of Iranian influence in RAK. However, they must be careful not to alienate the emirate's poorer and more Islamist population. For this reason, many observers believe that Sheikh Saud bin Saqr al-Qasimi will prevail.United Arab EmiratesDubaiRobert Boothguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds guardian.co.uk |
UK recovery is on track - Osborne George Osborne says the UK's economic recovery is "on track", following the upgrading of this year's official growth forecast. bbc.co.uk |